Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Kai-Chen Chang Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Groenefeld vs Chang analysis and find out who is favored!
Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Kai-Chen Chang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Groenefeld 1 - 0 Chang
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Groenefeld has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Chang has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Groenefeld, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chang has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Groenefeld has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chang has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Groenefeld has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Chang winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Groenefeld has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 128/ 67), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 3/ 12). Chang has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 17/ 11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 26% (W/L 9/ 25).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Groenefeld winning 1 times and Chang being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Groenefeld winning 2 and Chang winning 1. The last match between Groenefeld and Chang was at the Hansol Korea Open - Seoul, 23-09-2009, Second, Hard with Anna-Lena Groenefeld getting the victory 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Groenefeld and Chang have played a deciding set 1 times, with Groenefeld winning 1 times and Chang 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Groenefeld winning 0, and Chang 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Groenefeld has played against opponents with an average rank of while Chang has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Groenefeld has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chang has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Groenefeld has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chang has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ret.
Rank
14
High
38
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
82
High
33
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
57% (265-201)
Career Total W/L
55% (282-228)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$836,300
Career Prize Money
$426,433
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Groenefeld VS Chang H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Kai-Chen Chang |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 50% (57/114) | 65% (62/96) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (33/57) | 58% (36/62) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (31/57) | 32% (11/34) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (8/18) | 55% (6/11) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (49/96) | 44% (50/114) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Groenefeld VS Chang H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Anna-Lena Groenefeld
Player
Kai-Chen Chang
50%
(
57 of
114)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
96)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
54%
(
31 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
44%
(
50 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
96)
113
Total Points Won
97
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Kai-Chen Chang |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Anna-Lena Groenefeld Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Evgeniya Rodina
Player
Anna-Lena Groenefeld
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Groenefeld
Player
Kathrin Woerle
53%
(
70 of
132)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
1
Aces
6
12
Double Faults
4
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
44%
(
27 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
45%
(
60 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
110
Total Points Won
111
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Urszula Radwanska
Player
Anna-Lena Groenefeld
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
0
Total Points Won
0
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Renata Voracova
Player
Anna-Lena Groenefeld
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
10
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tetyana Arefyeva
Player
Anna-Lena Groenefeld
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Groenefeld
Player
Isabella Holland
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kai-Chen Chang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Kai-Chen Chang
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
79)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
2 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kai-Chen Chang
Player
Humera Baharmus
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
36%
(
16 of
44)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Xinyu Wang
Player
Kai-Chen Chang
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
27%
(
7 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kai-Chen Chang
Player
Riya Bhatia
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
7
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kai-Chen Chang
Player
Ho Ching Wu
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
46 of
83)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Kai-Chen Chang
Player
Yui Chikaraishi
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kai-Chen Chang
Player
Miyabi Inoue
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
6
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
47%
(
27 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Na-Lae Han
Player
Kai-Chen Chang
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kai-Chen Chang
Player
Su Jeong Jang
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
52 of
73)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Groenefeld Vs Chang Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
